Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment withR
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Identifying and Analyzing Judgment Opinions
In this paper, we introduce a methodology for analyzing judgment opinions. We define a judgment opinion as consisting of a valence, a holder, and a topic. We decompose the task of opinion analysis into four parts: 1) recognizing the opinion; 2) identifying the valence; 3) identifying the holder; and 4) identifying the topic. In this paper, we address the first three parts and evaluate our metho...
متن کاملOmission and commission in judgment and choice
Subjects read scenarios concerning pairs of options. One option was an omission, the other, a commission. Intentions, motives, and consequences were held constant. Subjects either judged the morality of actors by their choices or rated the goodness of decision options. Subjects often rated harmful omissions as less immoral, or less bad as decisions, than harmful commissions. Such ratings were a...
متن کاملAnalyzing how travelers choose scenic routes using route choice models
Finding a scenic route between two locations is a common trip planning task, in particular for tourists and recreational travelers. For the automated computation of a scenic route in a trip planning system it is necessary to identify which attributes of a route and its surroundings are associated with attractive scenery. This study uses a route choice model, more specifically a Path Size Logit ...
متن کاملThe Spatial Model and Speci cation of Choice Models
The spatial model has been in use in political science for close to 30 years, and in that period it has achieved a place of prime importance as our paradigm of the process of candidatechoice used by voters. For much of this time political scientists have estimated models of candidatechoice using binary logit or probit, even in cases where there were more than two choices facing voters. Recently...
متن کاملDecision by Sampling and Memory Distinctiveness: Range Effects from Rank-Based Models of Judgment and Choice
To what extent are preferences for risk – and for other economic quantities – stable, and to what extent are they malleable and context-dependent? Judgments and choices are strongly influenced by the context of available options in both the laboratory and the real world (e.g., Parducci, 1995; Sharpe et al., 2008), and this applies both to choices between risky options and more generally (Stewar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Statistical Software
سال: 2014
ISSN: 1548-7660
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v058.b01